0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
So a majority of Russian, Chinese and Indian citizens have all voted specifically in favor of their tax revenues being used for space travel? Or have their respective governments simply spent the money on the glorification of politicians without seeking consent?
Avoiding imprisonment, torture and murder does not equate, in my book, to consent. And thanks to religion and local corruption, the Indian electorate is too busy attacking itself to be concerned with the minutiae of government expenditure.The problem with vanity projects is that large opposition parties (where they exist) aspire to basking in their success if they get elected before completion!
Avoiding imprisonment, torture and murder does not equate, in my book, to consent. And thanks to religion and local corruption, the Indian electorate is too busy attacking itself to be concerned with the minutiae of government expenditure.
In democratic countries, consent can be expressed in votes.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 29/03/2024 12:38:54In democratic countries, consent can be expressed in votes.They have just held democratic election in Russia, and the USA is about to confer absolute power on a crook or an idiot, depending on how the vote goes. No question of whether anyone consents to expenditure on space exploration. Nor do I see it on the ballot paper in India.
When did the electorate get to vote on every possible item of government expenditure? And even when a majority have voted for something, it is still within the power of a relatively democratic party to form an unholy alliance with another and set aside that policy in the interests of commanding a parliamentary majority (at your expense, of course).
Republicans are increasingly panicking over the possible impact in 2024 of their continued assault on reproductive rights, most recently the Alabama IVF ruling
Presidents come and go (at least for the time being) but appointment to the SC is for life. As is the next president's debt to the Russian fascist.
They make calculations based on what they think are the most important for them. They would have to let go the less important things to get the most important ones. The same goes for the politicians and political parties.
Any conscious entity can be classified based on their thoughts and actions regarding the universal terminal goal.1. Those who think that there is a universal terminal goal, and act accordingly.2. Those who think that there is a universal terminal goal, but act contrary to the thought.3. Those who think that there is no universal terminal goal, and act accordingly.4. Those who think that there is no universal terminal goal, but act contrary to the thought.Any conscious entities that exist in the far future are almost surely come from type 1 conscious entities. Type 2 and 4 are unreliable, hence their results are mostly random. In long term, their chance to survive (preserve consciousness in any form) diminishes to near zero. Type 3 will extinct much earlier.
Problem is that a critical asset of a civilised society, such as Roe v Wade, took centuries to establish and hours to destroy, and will remain destroyed for as long as any of Trump's crooks and cronies on the SC bench remain alive. How long before they decriminalise slavery or lynching?
The Supreme Court is not elected by the voters, cannot be dismissed by anyone, and can only be replaced, by presidential nomination, on the death or resignation of a member.Slavery and lynching were very popular in their day. Since the next US president has already encouraged his supporters to invade Congress rather than accept a majority vote, and decreed that Neo-nazis are "good people" I think we can look forward to the end of civilisation in the USA.